Seek Outside Unaweep 6300 vs Seek Outside Goshawk 4800 2.0
Quick take: The Seek Outside Unaweep 6300 costs $4 less; the Seek Outside Unaweep 6300 carries more (103 vs 79 liters); the Seek Outside Unaweep 6300 is lighter (3.69 vs 4.13 lbs).
Which one to buy
Where the meat rides is the question, because almost everything else is shared. Both sit on Seek Outside's Revolution frame with 24, 26 or 28 in heights and S-XXL belts, both carry the same 200+ lb rating, and $4 separates them. The Unaweep 6300 sews a 103 L bag to the frame, so quarters go inside: owners say you empty your gear first and everything ends up in meat juice, though the waterproof laminate wipes clean. The Goshawk 4800 2.0 lets the bag break away so meat rides on a shelf between bag and frame, and its owners say that keeps blood out of your gear.
That shelf earns its place beyond hunting season too. Goshawk owners haul treestands, wood stoves, packrafts and even kid carriers on it. Its owners also say it packs well beyond its 79 L label, enough for 5-7 day hunts, so the Unaweep's 24 L advantage matters less than the numbers suggest. One Alaska hunter said the Goshawk carried better than his Stone Glacier with 100 pounds. The Unaweep has its own heavy-load record: one owner calls it great to 80 lb and just okay from 80-100, and a tester carried 120 lb on Denali.
The Unaweep's integrated design has one comfort cost its owners name directly: the bag rides against your back and runs noticeably hotter than the breakaway version. Its belt is also the weak point, with long-time owners saying the newer single-density foam is less comfortable above 40 lb, and the lumbar pad slides and balls up.
The Goshawk shares the belt complaint. Several owners name the hipbelt and lumbar pad as its weak point, report upper-glute pain past about 60 lb without the lumbar pad, and resent that the pad is a paid add-on. It's also famously strappy, with interlinked straps that take a while to figure out. Both bags are one big cavity with no organization, both laminates are loud in the cold, and neither can be tried on in a store, so the 30-day return window does the fitting. For hunters who expect to kill something and carry it out, the Goshawk's shelf is worth the setup learning curve.
Seek Outside Unaweep 6300
A good match for expedition trips and packrafting where the largest volume and a simpler, less strappy setup matter more than a separate meat compartment.
Seek Outside Goshawk 4800 2.0
For backcountry hunters who want quarters kept off their gear on a breakaway shelf, and who will budget for the lumbar pad add-on.
| Spec | Seek Outside Unaweep 6300 | Seek Outside Goshawk 4800 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $621 | $625 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Type | Hunting Pack | Hunting Pack |
| Frame Type | External Frame | External Frame |
| Capacity | 103 L | 79 L |
| Weight | 3.69 lbs | 4.13 lbs |
| Max Load | 200+ lbs | 200+ lbs |
| Torso Fit | Field-adjustable frame height 24 / 26 / 28 in; hipbelts S-XXL (27-48 in) | Field-adjustable frame height 24 / 26 / 28 in; hipbelts S-XXL (27-48 in) |
| Material | Ultra 200X laminate , roll-top closure | Ultra 200X or UltraGrid |
| Back Panel | Revolution frame, integrated bag (no breakaway); included internal load shelf holds meat inside the bag against the frame | Revolution external frame with breakaway load shelf between bag and frame |
| Adjustable torso | Yes | Yes |
| Ventilated back | No | No |
| Raincover included | No | No |
| Hipbelt pockets | No | No |
| Removable lid | Yes | Yes |
| Hydration sleeve | No | No |
| Fits BV500 bear can | Yes | No |
| Warranty | Seek Outside lifetime warranty on workmanship; 30-day return policy | Seek Outside lifetime warranty on workmanship; 30-day return policy |
Pros & cons
Seek Outside Unaweep 6300
- ✓GearJunkie scored it 8.7/10, calling the Revolution frame better-carrying than practically any pack they had tested.
- ✓It has been carried at 120 lbs on Denali's West Buttress, where the rigid frame let the tester pull that weight tight against the back.
- ✓First-load reactions are unusually strong — one owner said 50 lbs 'felt like I was carrying half the weight' compared to his previous pack.
- ✓An ultralight reviewer rated it the most comfortable load hauler he had used after direct comparison against HMG, Exped, Osprey, and a custom McHale.
- ✓Durability holds up over serious mileage; one owner reported 2,000+ miles without much wear.
- ✓It compresses to nearly nothing, so owners consistently advise buying the 6300 over the 4800 — the weight penalty between them is only about 5 ounces.
- ✓Going integrated saves real weight over comparable framed haulers; at 3.69 lbs it is about 2.7 lbs lighter than a Kifaru 44 Mag system.
- ✓The laminate fabric is effectively waterproof and cleans easily, which is why load-shelf partisans say it is the one pack they would carry meat inside.
- ✗With no breakaway shelf, quarters go inside the bag on the included internal load shelf — owners note you must empty your gear out first and everything ends up covered in meat juice.
- ✗The bag rides directly against your back, and owners report it runs noticeably hotter and sweatier than the breakaway version.
- ✗The roll-top fabric is loud in cold weather, which several bowhunters call out as a real drawback.
- ✗The belt is the documented failure point above roughly 100 lbs — one owner's summary is that it is great to 80, just okay from 80-100, and problematic past 120.
- ✗The lumbar pad attaches by wrapping the belt, so owners report it sliding and balling up rather than staying put.
- ✗Fit is bimodal rather than universal: owners with pronounced lumbar curve report the frame leaning off their back, and several gave up after buying twice.
- ✗Price has crept steadily — from $519 at launch to $621 today, which GearJunkie noted now exceeds every Hyperlite Mountain Gear pack.
- ✗Seek Outside switched from dual-density to single-density belt foam, and long-time owners say the newer belts are less comfortable above 40 lbs.
Seek Outside Goshawk 4800 2.0
- ✓Owners repeatedly say it out-carries heavier rivals at extreme loads — one Alaska hunter reported it 'carried better than my Stone Glacier with 100 pounds.'
- ✓The breakaway shelf keeps blood out of your gear, and owners note dried blood wipes off the Ultra fabric with wet paper towels rather than needing a wash.
- ✓It packs far bigger than its 4800 ci label — multiple owners say it swallows closer to 6500 ci and comfortably covers 5-7 day hunts.
- ✓A side-by-side rucking test at 60 lbs had it beating a Kifaru T2 on both comfort and hipbelt grip, despite weighing substantially less.
- ✓The load shelf carries bulky non-meat loads too — owners haul treestands, wood stoves, packrafts, and even kid carriers between bag and frame.
- ✓It compresses down convincingly for day hunts; owners report barely noticing it when cinched into daypack mode.
- ✓Gatekeeper strap ends let you tighten from both directions, halving the loose strap tails that plague other load-shelf packs.
- ✗The hipbelt and lumbar pad are the weak point several owners name — some who otherwise love the frame say Exo's K4 belt is clearly better padded.
- ✗The lumbar pad is a paid add-on, which owners find hard to justify when Kifaru, Stone Glacier, and Exo all include one.
- ✗Without that lumbar pad, owners report upper-glute pain once loads pass about 60 lbs.
- ✗It is famously strappy — the compression, lid, and Talon straps interconnect, so loosening one loosens the others.
- ✗There is essentially no organization; it is one big bag, and owners coming from Mystery Ranch or Exo miss having pockets.
- ✗The laminate fabric crinkles audibly in the cold — one owner described rummaging in it at 25 degrees as 'about as bad as it gets' for noise.
- ✗Setup has a real learning curve; owners consistently describe the strap system as overwhelming until they work out their own configuration.
- ✗Seek Outside is direct-to-consumer with no retail presence, so you cannot try one on, and its on-site rating currently rests on a single review.
Seek Outside Unaweep 6300 vs Seek Outside Goshawk 4800 2.0: common questions
Is the Goshawk's load shelf worth it over packing meat inside the Unaweep 6300?▾
For regular meat hunters, yes. Unaweep owners say carrying quarters inside means emptying your gear and getting meat juice on everything, while Goshawk owners say the shelf keeps blood out of the bag and doubles for treestands and packrafts.
Does the Unaweep 6300 run hotter than the Goshawk 4800?▾
Its owners say so. The Unaweep's bag rides directly against your back and runs noticeably hotter than the breakaway version, which suits cold-season hunts better than early-season heat.
Is 79 L enough, or should I get the 103 L Unaweep?▾
Goshawk owners say it packs far bigger than its label and covers 5-7 day hunts. Unaweep owners advise taking the biggest size because it compresses well, so pick the Unaweep only if you need expedition volume more than a meat shelf.
Do I need extra parts with either pack?▾
Plan on the lumbar pad for the Goshawk, since owners report upper-glute pain past about 60 lb without it and it's sold separately. Unaweep owners say its wrap-around lumbar pad tends to slide and ball up instead.