REI Co-op Flash 55 vs Gossamer Gear Kumo 36

REI Co-op Flash 55

REI Co-op

REI Co-op Flash 55

$199

4.2★ (98)

vs

Gossamer Gear

Gossamer Gear Kumo 36

$180

Quick take: The Gossamer Gear Kumo 36 costs $19 less; the REI Co-op Flash 55 carries more (55 vs 40 liters); the Gossamer Gear Kumo 36 is lighter (1.25 vs 2.81 lbs).

SpecREI Co-op Flash 55Gossamer Gear Kumo 36
Price$199$180
Rating4.2★ (98)
TypeUltralight PackUltralight Pack
Frame TypeInternal FrameFrameless
Capacity55 L40 L
Weight2.81 lbs1.25 lbs
Max Load30 lbsNot specified by the manufacturer
Torso FitSized S-L, 15-20 inSee manufacturer sizing
Material100D ripstop nylon70D and 100D recycled Robic nylon
Back PanelFramed foam with ventilation channelFrameless with removable sit pad
Adjustable torsoNoNo
Ventilated backNoNo
Raincover includedNoNo
Hipbelt pocketsYesYes
Removable lidYesNo
Hydration sleeveYesNo
Fits BV500 bear canYesNo
WarrantyREI 1-year satisfaction guaranteeManufacturer warranty; terms not published

Pros & cons

REI Co-op Flash 55

  • The consensus best-value ultralight pack — r/Ultralight repeatedly ranks it the cheapest pack that doesn't compromise the essentials.
  • The Packmod system is genuinely clever: strip the lid, pockets, and straps to drop from 2.8 to about 2.35 lbs.
  • Frequent REI sales bring it near $150, undercutting every serious competitor by $100+.
  • The roll-top plus side zip gives both compression and mid-pack access, a combo rare at any price.
  • Hipbelt pockets come standard and fit modern phones — a dig at the Exos in every comparison thread.
  • A BV500 fits horizontally, which canister-country hikers specifically buy it for.
  • The 100D recycled ripstop wears better than its weight suggests; multi-thousand-mile PCT reports exist.
  • REI's return window makes it the lowest-risk way to test whether ultralight works for you.
  • The 30 lb comfort ceiling is real and arrives abruptly — reviewers agree it sours above that line faster than the Exos.
  • The foam back panel ventilates poorly compared to trampoline designs; sweat is the common summer gripe.
  • Fixed torso sizes with no adjustability make between-sizes buyers gamble.
  • The hipbelt wings flex under load, letting heavy carries sag onto shoulders.
  • Shoulder-strap padding is thin, a frequent complaint from higher-load users.
  • The bottle pockets angle awkwardly; retrieving a bottle one-handed takes practice.
  • Removable pieces are easy to lose and cost real money to replace.
  • Its 4.4-star REI average hides a bimodal split: light packers love it, heavy packers don't.

Gossamer Gear Kumo 36

  • $180 is the cheapest entry to a well-regarded cottage brand in this catalog.
  • The removable SitLight pad doubles as back structure and a camp seat, so it is not dead weight.
  • 1 lb 4 oz for 40 L of usable volume is an excellent ratio.
  • 70D and 100D recycled Robic is a proven, repairable woven fabric rather than a laminate.
  • Gossamer Gear has one of the longest track records among cottage makers.
  • Removing the pad strips the pack down further for very light trips.
  • Hipbelt pockets included at this price.
  • Woven nylon is far easier to field-repair than DCF or Ultra laminates.
  • Frameless, so loads much above 20 lb become uncomfortable quickly.
  • No published maximum load figure.
  • 70D fabric on parts of the body is thin and abrades on rock.
  • Not waterproof, unlike the DCF and Ultra packs at higher prices.
  • No adjustable torso.
  • 36 L is too small for a bear canister plus a week of food.
  • Warranty terms are not published in detail.
  • Requires disciplined packing with the pad positioned correctly to carry well.